[00:00:04]
          NOT TO DO THAT TONIGHT. OKAY? ROLL RIGHT ON. ALRIGHT. WE WILL CALL PUBLIC WORKS TO ORDER. MR. 
          [Call to Order]
BLAIR, DO YOU HAVE THE ATTENDANCE ALREADY? ALRIGHT. VERY GOOD. AND WE ARE GOING TO GO OUT OF ORDER JUST TO SEE IF I CAN CONFUSE MYSELF. CARL. HOLY COW! SO CARL DOESN'T HAVE 
          [g. 2025-2075 – WATER POLLUTION RE:     APPROVAL OF MODIFICATIONS TO STANDARD PERFORMANCE CONTRACT AGREEMENT BETWEEN ONEIDA COUNTY, THROUGH ITS DEPARTMENT OF WATER QUALITY AND WATER POLLUTION CONTROL, AND NEW YORK STATE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY]
TO WAIT THROUGH THE OTHER 5 OR 6 DOCKETS. ALRIGHT, WE'LL START OFF WITH 2075 WATER QUALITY AND WATER POLLUTION CONTROL GRANT MODIFICATION FOUND ON PAGES 81 THROUGH 83 OF COMMUNICATIONS. 
          THIS IS JUST MOPPING UP THE NYSERDA GRANT THAT WE HAD FOR $2 MILLION. WE'RE JUST REFORMATTING. CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, CARL. WE'RE JUST REFORMATTING THE INCENTIVE PAYMENT VERBIAGE SO WE CAN COLLECT THE LAST BALLPARK, $1.2 MILLION ON THIS. SO THERE'S NO DOLLAR DIFFERENCE. IT'S THE SAME 2 MILLION. WE'RE GETTING THE SAME AMOUNT. WE'RE JUST MOPPING THIS UP AND TRYING TO GET THE CHECK IN HOUSE BEFORE JANUARY 1ST. CORRECT. THAT'S THE GOAL. YES. QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE. MOPPING IT UP. YES. HAVING NONE. WE'LL CALL THE VOTE. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. KARL, THANK YOU 
          [a. 2025-2190 – PUBLIC WORKS RE:                 TRANSFER OF $350,000.00 TO D 5110 5110.495-000 – OTHER EXPENSE (DPW)]
VERY MUCH. YOU'RE WELCOME TO STAY, BUT I DOUBT YOU WILL. ALL RIGHT. MOVING ON. DPW 2190 NOW. 
          WE'LL GO IN ORDER. STEVE. YES? THIS IS IT'S GOING BETTER. WHAT'S GOING BETTER THAN IT IS? IT'S GOING BETTER THAN LAST NIGHT. I HAVE FAITH IN YOU, MIKE. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. I LIKE SOME OF MY COLLEAGUES. ALRIGHT. FOUND ON PAGES 62 THROUGH 63 OF OUR DOCUMENTATION. 
          PUBLIC WORKS REQUEST AN INTER-DEPARTMENTAL FUND TRANSFER TO PAY FOR THE ADDITIONAL TREE REMOVAL. DUE TO THE EXTENSIVE STORM DAMAGE, 350 BEING TRANSFERRED FROM INTO THE OTHER TWO ACCOUNTS FOR HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE AND HIGHWAY. OTHER QUESTIONS ON THE TREE REMOVAL. 
          HAVING NONE. WE'LL CALL THE VOTE ON THAT. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? PASSES 
          [b. 2025-2111 – PUBLIC WORKS RE:    APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NO. 1 BETWEEN ONEIDA COUNTY, THROUGH ITS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, AND ATLANTIC TESTING LABORATORIES, LIMITED]
UNANIMOUSLY 2111 DPW CONTRACT AMENDMENT AGAIN FOUND ON PAGES 64 THROUGH 66. THIS IS WITH ATLANTIC TESTING LABS. PROBABLY THE BEST WAY TO EXPLAIN THIS IS WE WENT OUT TO BID ON THIS. THE BIDS CAME BACK. WE KNEW INITIALLY WHAT I'LL CALL PHASE ONE WAS GOING TO MOST LIKELY HAVE INCREASES IN THE QUANTITIES THAT WE'RE GOING TO NEED DONE. SO THE PRICES PER PER UNIT IS NOT INCREASED, BUT THE QUANTITIES HAVE. THEREFORE THE AGGREGATE AMOUNT HAS CHANGED. AND THAT'S WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT HERE. THIS KEEPS IT WELL WITHIN THE BID RANGE. 
          RIGHT MATT. THEY STILL CAME UP TO BE A LITTLE BITTER BECAUSE THE THEY WERE LOW ON THE PER UNIT PRICE. AND IT'S BASICALLY JUST A THEY'RE SPECIAL TESTING FOR LIKE CONCRETE AND OTHER THINGS. SO IT'S JUST TOO LOW ON THE PER UNIT. THEY'RE GONNA BE LOW ON THE SCOPE AND THE AGGREGATE. QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE. HAVING NONE. ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. ANY OPPOSED. 
          [c. 2025-2174 – PUBLIC WORKS RE:    APPROVAL OF SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 2 TO CONTRACT NO. D014763 BETWEEN ONEIDA COUNTY, THROUGH ITS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, AND NEW YORK STATE, THROUGH ITS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION]
PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. MOVING ON TO 2174. THIS IS THE SNOWPLOWING CONTRACT AMENDMENT FOUND ON PAGES 67 THROUGH 69. THIS IS FOR THE 2425 YEAR. IT'S AN ADJUSTMENT UPWARD FOR US. 
          THE ORIGINAL ESTIMATE WAS SOMEWHERE AROUND 2.9 MILLION. AND THIS IS AN INCREASE OF 2.1 AGAINST THAT. SO IT'S MORE MONEY IN OUR COFFERS FROM THE STATE. ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS KEITH. HAPPY TO ANSWER QUESTION. THIS ONE IS. SO NOT NECESSARILY ARE RELATIVE TO THE CONTRACT AS MUCH AS PROCEDURAL WITH TOWNS. IT SEEMS LIKE THERE'S BEEN SOME SOME PUBLIC RELATIONS PROMOTION ON USE OF SALTS. AND WHETHER IT'S HIGHWAYS, SIDEWALKS, ETC. IS THERE TIED TO THIS CONTRACT ANY REQUIREMENTS IN SPECIFIC TOWNS AND WHAT THE EXPECTATION IS OF THEIR MANAGEMENT OF COUNTY ROADS IN REGARD TO SALT OR SAND OR SALT SAND MIX OR SO THIS IS ONLY BETWEEN THE COUNTY AND THE STATE. SO THIS IS THIS IS FOR LAST WINTER, BASICALLY THE WAY, YOU KNOW, FOR CONTRACTING OUT THE SERVICES, THE WAY WE DO WITH THE STATE IS THAT WE PROVIDE THEM ALL THE DOCUMENTATION. THEY REIMBURSE US PER PER MATERIAL SPENT, PER HOUR SPENT AND EVERYTHING ELSE FOR PAYROLL. AND SO THE ORIGINAL ESTIMATE WAS THAT, YOU KNOW, JUST UNDER 3 MILLION ENDED UP BEING 5 MILLION. SO WE'RE ABLE TO GO BACK AND ADJUST THAT WITH THE TOWNS. NO, THERE'S NOT WITH THAT CONTRACT, THE STATE IS PUSHING THAT ON THEIR SIDE. THEY'RE TRYING TO YOU KNOW, THERE IS SOME GRANT MONEY THAT'S GOING TO BECOME AVAILABLE SOON. I WAS JUST ACTUALLY MEETING WITH DOT EARLIER TODAY AND THEY'RE THEY'RE GOING TO BE PUSHING IT. 
          [00:05:05]
BUT THERE'S NO MANDATES AS OF NOW. THEY'RE PUSHING IT MORE IN THE ADIRONDACK PARK AREA. AND THEN OVER BY, YOU KNOW LIKE WARREN COUNTY. I THINK HE'S BEEN DOING A LOT, YOU KNOW, NEAR THE BIGGER LAKES. BUT SO, SO RELATIVE TO THAT, THEN DO THEY DICTATE TO YOU ON THE CONTRACTS, ON THEIR ROADS OF WHAT? THEIR EXPECTATIONS. YES. THEY'RE THEY'RE A LOT STRICTER WITH US THAN WE ARE WITH THE TOWNS THEY ARE. SO WE USE ONLY SALT, BUT THEY REIMBURSE US FOR ALL THE SALT THAT WE USE. SO THEY'RE BECAUSE THEY REIMBURSE US FOR EVERY ASPECT OF IT, THEY'RE ABLE TO KIND OF DICTATE MORE. SO HOW WE DO IT, THAT MAKES SENSE. SO I'M ASSUMING IF YOU LIKE THE WEATHER WE'VE JUST HAD AND EVEN TODAY, IF A COUNTY TRUCK IS MAINTAINING UNDER THIS CONTRACT THE STATE ROAD, IF THEY'RE DROPPING SALT, THAT'S KIND OF WHAT THE MANAGEMENT FROM. THAT'S WHAT THE STATE'S GOING TO EXPECT. YES. AND SO THE STATE YEAH THAT THAT GOES TO THE STATE'S TRACKING OF THEIR SALT ON THEIR ROADS. YES. AND THEY'RE THEY'RE TRACKING THAT. SO THEY'RE DOING RIGHT NOW THEY'RE DOING MORE KIND OF PILOT PROGRAMS OF TRYING DIFFERENT THINGS WITH THE ROADS THAT THEY'RE APPLYING WITH THEIR OWN PEOPLE. THEY'RE DOING MORE WITH BRIAN. BRIAN ACTIVATING THE SALT PRE-TREATING. WE ARE DOING SOME PRE-TREATING FOR THEM, FOR SOME OF THEIR ROADS THAT THEY'VE SO THEY BRING US BRIAN, FILL UP OUR TANK, WE PUT IT OUT FOR THEM, FOR THE ROADS THAT WE MAINTAIN FOR SOME OF THEM. AND WE HAVE SEEN SOME SUCCESS WITH THAT, ABLE TO GET KIND OF A BETTER SCRAPE. YOU KNOW, THAT THE CONDITIONS ARE RIGHT. BUT IN THE BRAINS OF LIQUID APPLICATION. CORRECT? YES. SO, SO THE MECHANICS OF TRACKING THAT IF, IF A TRUCKS LOADED WITH TEN TONS OF SALT AND IT GOES OUT AND, AND SPREADS THAT FULL LOAD THAT GETS TRACKED IN YOUR SYSTEM TO BILL THEM THROUGH THIS CONTRACT. YEP. WE HAVE A FULL COMPUTERIZED SYSTEM IN EVERY TRUCK THROUGH A COMPANY CALLED REXROTH. AND WE'RE ABLE TO TRACK EXACTLY HOW MUCH MATERIAL IS PUT DOWN WHERE AND JUST FOUND IT TODAY, AS IN UTICA NOONTIME AND A DIFFERENCE IN ROADS FROM UTICA TO VERNON. 
          OUT OUR WAY WAS BARE ROADS. HERE WAS A TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF SLUSH. AND THEN NOTICING EVEN THAT OF A COUPLE OF THE STATE ROADS 26 I'M ASSUMING THE COUNTY PROBABLY THAT'S NOT PLOWING 26 TO 5 IN VERNON, BUT BUT JUST HOW THE DIFFERENCE IN THE WEATHER AND WHAT GOT SALTED AND WHAT DIDN'T. AND VARIOUS ROADS TODAY IT WAS PRETTY EVIDENT. YEAH. I MEAN IT'S THERE'S THE CITY PLOWING VERSUS KIND OF MORE RURAL PLOWING IS, YOU KNOW, DIFFERENT IN A LOT OF DIFFERENT WAYS. BUT THE BIGGEST ISSUE IS REALLY WITH THE CITY PLOWING, THERE'S REALLY NOWHERE FOR THE SNOW TO GO. SO WHEN THEY WHEN THEY PLOW IT IT MELTS SOME AND COMES BACK IN. SO IT'S IT'S A LOT TOUGHER THAN THAT. WASHES AWAY SALT THAT MIGHT HAVE BEEN ON THE GROUND AND EVERYTHING ELSE WHERE WHEN YOU'RE PLOWING THE RAILROADS IT GOES INTO DITCHES AND IT'S AWAY FROM THE ROAD DOESN'T COME BACK AT ALL. SO IT'S, THERE'S, YOU KNOW, AND THEN THERE'S ALSO, YOU KNOW, OTHER ASPECTS LIKE THE CURBING AND EVERYTHING ELSE. BUT THERE'S BUT YEAH, IT'S THEN ALSO, YOU KNOW, THE CITY HAS TO DEAL WITH A LOT MORE STREET PARKING AND STUFF THAT TO GO AROUND A LOT MORE OBSTACLES THAT ARE IN THE WAY OF THE PLOWS AND AT TIMES WHEN THEY CAN'T GET THROUGH AND STUFF LIKE THAT. SO IT'S A WHOLE DIFFERENT BALL GAME. VERY GOOD. 
          APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. OTHER QUESTIONS? ONE QUICK ONE, SIR. LAST YEAR WE ESTIMATED 2.9. SO THE WAY THE CONTRACT WORK IS IT TAKES THE LAST THREE PRIOR YEARS AND AND AVERAGES THEM. AND THAT'S WHAT THE ESTIMATE IS FOR THE FOLLOWING YEAR. SO I DON'T HAVE EXACT NUMBERS THIS YEAR BUT IT'S BASICALLY. YEAH SURE. YEAH. OTHER QUESTIONS HAVING NONE. 
          WE'LL VOTE ON 2174. ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. ANY OPPOSED PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. MOVING ON 
          [d. 2025-2130 – PUBLIC WORKS RE:     ACCEPTANCE OF A PROPOSAL FROM MARCH ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTS AND PLANNERS, P.C. FOR 300 W. DOMINICK STREET TORNADO REMEDIATION – DESIGN SERVICES – PROJECT]
TO 2130 DPW DESIGN SERVICES, PAGES 70 THROUGH 71. PUBLIC WORKS SEEKS APPROVAL OF A PROPOSAL FROM MARCH ASSOCIATES FOR FURTHER ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN WORK TO PRODUCE A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF REPAIRS AND REPLACEMENT, WHICH IS GOING TO REQUIRED FOR THE 300 WEST DOMINICK STREET BUILDING IN ROME SO IT CAN BE REOPENED FOR USE BY COUNTY WORKERS. 
          FOLLOWING ONE OF OUR TORNADOES IN 2024. THE AMOUNT IS 650,800. QUESTIONS ON THIS, CHRIS. SO THIS IS JUST A CONSULTANT SERVICES. THIS ISN'T THE ACTUAL DESIGN OR OBVIOUSLY NOT ANY OF THE WORK, BUT THIS IS JUST A CONSULTANT. SO THIS IS DESIGNED THIS IS DESIGNED FOR THE FULL DESIGN. YES OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THIS IS A BILL THAT'S PRETTY MUCH BEEN GUTTED RIGHT THROUGH THE RESTORATION PROCESS. EVERYTHING I MEAN THIS IS AN EMPTY SHELL. SO THEY'RE GOING TO DO THE DESIGN WORK. AND WHEN IT SAYS CONSULTANT SERVICES IS THAT IS THAT PROVIDING INSPECTION SERVICES ONCE THE CONTRACT AWARDED. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT. YEAH. BUT NOT THE SPECIAL INSPECTION HAS TO BE BY THIRD PARTIES LIKE THE ATLANTIC LABORATORY. SO THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PORTION IS COVERED UNDER THIS. THIS ONE AT LEAST THE CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION, 
          [00:10:01]
THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT IS NOT FULLY COVERED ON THIS, BUT THIS PROJECT. I'M NOT SURE IF WE'LL HAVE THAT OR NOT YET. THE TOTAL IS AND THEN WE'LL LOOK AT WHAT MAKES SENSE. IT'S SOMETHING THAT THE COUNTY COULD OVERSEE. YEAH. SO THAT'S WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT TO SEE WHERE THAT. GOTCHA. GOTCHA. WHAT ELSE IS GOING ON. THANKS. SO OTHER QUESTIONS MR. BUCK. SO DID WE GIVE THEM A BASIS OF DESIGN, WHAT WE WANT OR HOW DID THEY COME UP WITH THIS BIG RFP? WE GAVE A SCOPE AND EVERYTHING ELSE. AND SO IT'S YOU KNOW, YOU TELL THEM WHAT WE'RE STARTING WITH. SO IT INCLUDES, YOU KNOW, MEETING WITH DEPARTMENTS. YOU KNOW, IT'S WE'RE LOOKING TO IMPROVE THE SPACE EVEN, YOU KNOW, MORE. SO IT'LL BE THE SAME KIND OF STUFF IN THERE. 
          BUT IMPROVE THE LAYOUT AND THE HOUSE FOR TODAY'S NEEDS. SO YOU KNOW THEY MET WITH THE TIME AND THEY'RE COMPETING WITH DEPARTMENTS GOING THROUGH DIFFERENT LAYOUTS AND THINGS LIKE THAT. SO IT'S YOU KNOW, THEY HAVE A GOOD IDEA, THEY HAVE THE DESIGNS AND THE RFP IS RELEASED PUBLICLY, BUT THE PAPER EVERYTHING ELSE AND THEY THEY WERE THE WINNING BIDS. SO I MEAN, NO, NO, YOU CAN LOOK AT MY COLLEAGUES KEEP LOOKING AT ME BECAUSE THEY KNOW IT'S MARCH ASSOCIATES. I'M NOT A FAN OF MARCH ASSOCIATES. BECAUSE I JUST DON'T LET THEM KEEP COMING BACK ASKING FOR, WELL, WE NEED MONEY FOR THIS. WE NEED MONEY FOR THAT. IS THAT GOING TO BE THE SAME SITUATION HERE? A LOT OF CHANGE ORDERS POP UP, I HEAR YOU. I DON'T KNOW WHAT I DON'T KNOW RIGHT NOW. THIS COVERS EVERYTHING THAT WE'RE WE'RE AWARE OF. BUT I MEAN, IF IT'S A GUTTED BUILDING, THERE SHOULDN'T BE MUCH OF A DESIGN TO IT EXCEPT FOR OR OVERSEEING. 
          EXCEPT FOR THE BASICS. NO. YEAH. STARTING UP THE MARCH WE HAVE A MARCH IS MOSTLY BEEN FROM THE COUNTY CHANGING WHAT THE SCOPE WAS AFTER THE CONTRACT WAS UP. SO IT WAS UPDATES WHERE, YOU KNOW, WE'RE IN THE MIDDLE OF SOMETHING AND, YOU KNOW, WE HAD TO MAKE A CHANGE BECAUSE OF OUTSIDE FORCES OR SOMETHING ELSE. OR THERE'S OTHER THINGS, YOU KNOW, THAT PLAY INTO IT. SO THIS ONE, YOU KNOW. SO NO, I'M PRETTY CONFIDENT IT SHOULD BE GOOD. BUT AGAIN, I DON'T WANT TO. ANY IDEA ON A BUDGET FOR THIS OVERALL PROJECT, THE WHOLE PROJECT I BELIEVE WE HAD THAT. 
          I COULD GET THAT TO YOU. I JUST WONDERING IF IT I MEAN, IF IT MAKES SENSE. THIS IS ALL INSURANCE EVERYTHING. SO THE DESIGN MONEY, ALL THAT IS 100% INSURANCE ADJUSTER AND THEY'RE THEY'RE COVERING UP TO WHAT THE AMOUNT WAS WE PUT IN. SO I'LL GET THAT NUMBER FOR YOU. GOOD. 
          DAVE I'M NEVER GOOD I REALIZE THAT. OKAY, CHRIS, FOLLOW UP. ONE OF MY QUESTIONS WAS ARE WE SELF-INSURED OR WAS THIS AN INSURANCE? AND THE OTHER QUESTION IS BECAUSE I HADN'T BEEN AROUND THAT LONG, WHAT IS THE 300? SO THAT'S THE OLD BUILDING AND LOAN. SO IT'S GOT WORKING SOLUTIONS AS PART OF THIS ELEMENT. IT'S GOT THE ROME HEALTH FUNDING. IT'S GOT PORTIONS OF FORM OF THE DCIS. IT'S GOT PROBATION OFFICES. SO BASICALLY THE OFFICES THAT ARE RIGHT NOW UNDER WEBCOMIC, THEY'RE MOVING BACK. SO YOU KNOW. GOTCHA. OKAY. THANK YOU. 
          YES, SIR. ARE WE STILL RENTING THE SPACE FOR THE. YES AT THE OLD BANK? AND CAN THE INSURANCE COVER THAT? CAN CAN THE INSURANCE COVER THE RENT? COVER RENT? WE'LL PUT IT BACK IN, BECAUSE THE REASON FOR THE DELAY IN THE HOUSE WAS THE FOCUS WAS ON 301 TO GET THAT BACK UP AND GOING, BECAUSE THERE WAS NO REPLACEMENT FOR THAT. THEY WERE ALL SHOVED INTO 301 JAMES STREET. SO THAT WAS THERE. THEN ONCE WE GOT THAT THERE WE GO OUT THE RFP AND GO THROUGH THE WHOLE PROCESS. AND THAT'S WHERE WE ARE NOW. SO WE DID THE FIRST BUILDING. NOW WE'RE DOING THIS ONE. THANK YOU SIR. TYPICALLY INSURANCE COMPANY LEAVING COVER THE MOVE OKAY. OTHER QUESTIONS HAVING NONE. WE'LL CALL THE VOTE. ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. ANY 
          [e. 2025-2247 – PUBLIC WORKS RE:                 APPROVAL OF A PRIVATE HYDRANT RESTRICTIVE USE AGREEMENT #43 BETWEEN ONEIDA COUNTY, THROUGH ITS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, AND THE MOHAWK VALLEY WATER AUTHORITY]
OPPOSED? PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. MOVING ON TO 2247. DPW FIRE HYDRANT FOUND ON PAGES 74 THROUGH 76. COMMUNICATIONS. PUBLIC WORKS REQUEST AUTHORIZATION FOR A PRIVATE HYDRANT RESTRICTION USE AGREEMENT WITH THE MOHAWK VALLEY WATER AUTHORITY TO ADD FIRE HYDRANT AT 121 SECOND STREET, WHITESTOWN, BETTER KNOWN AS THE CORNELL EXTENSION BUILDING. THE AGREEMENT STIPULATES THAT THE NEW FIRE HYDRANT IS EXCLUSIVELY FOR THE FIRE PROTECTION OF THE EXPANDED BUILDING. QUESTIONS. KEITH. WHAT WHAT TRIGGERED THE REQUEST? SO THIS WAS A WITH THE EXPANSION OF THE BUILDING, WE HAD TO INSTALL ANOTHER FIRE HYDRANT AS PART OF THE PROJECT. AND THE FIRE HYDRANT IS PRIOR TO OUR METER. SO THIS IS BASICALLY JUST AN AGREEMENT SAYING THAT WE'RE NOT GOING TO USE IT TO WATER THE LAWN. WE'RE NOT GOING TO USE IT TO FILL UP TANKS. IT'S ONLY TO BE USED FOR FIRE PROTECTION BECAUSE IT'S NOT WATER, THAT'S WATER. SO WITH THAT, AND KNOWING OUR INVESTMENT IN THE NEW FACILITY, DOES THAT AFFECT EXTENSIONS, INSURANCE OR THE COUNTIES ON THAT FACILITY TO TO KNOW THAT 
          [00:15:01]
YOU HAVE ADDITIONAL FIRE COVERAGE? I MEAN, IT'S IT'S, I MEAN, IT'S IT'S MEETS THE CODE. 
          SO IT'S I DON'T KNOW IF IT WHAT TO DO WITH THE LARGER BUILDING. I DON'T KNOW IF IT INCREASES IT OR JUST KEEPS IT AT THE SAME LEVEL. I COULDN'T ANSWER THAT. AND BUT RIGHT DOES. AND INSURANCE ON THAT. IS THAT THROUGH EXTENSION OR IS IT COUNTY THAT BECAUSE OF THE COUNTIES COUNTY BUILDING. SURE. RIGHT. WELL AND I KNOW WAS AT ZERO COST OBVIOUSLY VERY POSITIVE THING BUT DIDN'T KNOW WITH THE POTENTIAL SAVINGS AND AND KNOWING HOW CORNELL GETS REIMBURSED FROM UNIVERSITY AND DIFFERENT THINGS OF IF THERE'S A RELATED SAVINGS THERE. BUT VERY GOOD. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. YES, SIR. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? HAVING NONE, WE'LL CALL THE VOTE ON 2247. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. 
          [f. 2025-2201 – PUBLIC WORKS RE:    APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NUMBER 1 TO AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN ONEIDA COUNTY, THROUGH ITS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, AND BARTON & LOGUIDICE, D.P.C.]
LAST DOCKET 2201. DPW CONTRACT AMENDMENT, PAGES 77 THROUGH 80. COMMUNICATIONS PUBLIC WORKS SEEKS AUTHORIZATION TO ALLOW BARTON LOGIUDICE TO MODIFY THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS ON A TIME AND EXPENSE BASIS, AT AN ESTIMATED FEE OF $8,000. BNL ORIGINALLY PREPARED THE DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR THE TWO FUEL DISPENSING FACILITIES AT THE WHITESTOWN DPW FACILITY, AND THE SUBSEQUENT BIDS WERE OVER THE ALLOWABLE BUDGET, REQUIRING A RESTRUCTURING OF THE DOCUMENTS THAT WERE REQUIRING AND THE REBUILDING OF THE PROJECT. THE FIRM PROPOSES TO REWORK THE DOCUMENTS FOR THE $8,000, RAISING THE CONTRACT AMOUNT TO AN AGGREGATE AMOUNT OF 96,250. 
          QUESTIONS ON THIS AMENDMENT, CHRIS, I ONLY HOPE THAT THE BIDS WEREN'T LESS THAN $8,000 OVER. DOESN'T MAKE MUCH SENSE DOING IT. SO LET'S. THIS WAS IT WAS SUBSTANTIALLY OVER. THERE WAS ONLY ONE BIDDER THAT CAME IN. SO WE'RE WORKING ON TO MAKE SURE THAT WE CAN AWARD WHATEVER COMES IN. SO WE'RE GOING TO MAKE THE, YOU KNOW, THE AREAS THAT ARE NEEDED RIGHT NOW AS A BASE. AND THEN THE THINGS THAT ARE MORE EFFICIENT AND COST EFFECTIVE FOR THE LONG TERM AND THE ALTERNATE. AND SO WE'RE ALSO GOING TO BE WORKING TO GET MORE OUTREACH OUT THERE TO THE OTHER VENDORS, BECAUSE OBVIOUSLY FUEL ISLAND IS A VERY SPECIFIC FIELD. SO WE ONLY HAVE ONE, YOU KNOW, PERSON BID ON IT. SO THEY WEREN'T LIKE $6,000 HIGH. NO, NO, NO, THEY WERE I THINK IT WAS ALMOST 5000. GOOD CHRIS I'M GREAT. ALRIGHT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? HAVING NONE. 
          WE'LL CALL THE VOTE ON 2201. ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. I WILL TAKE A MOTION TO ADJOURN. SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR?
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.