[Call to Order]
          [00:00:08]
          GENTLEMEN, WE'RE GOING TO CALL THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS MEETING TO ORDER, PLEASE. IF WE CAN HAVE THE CHAMBERS. QUIET DOWN. MR. BLAIR, DO YOU HAVE THE ROLL ALREADY? ALL RIGHT. JULIAN, 
          [Presentations]
YOU HAD REQUESTED TO HAVE. YES. REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE WATER AUTHORITY. COME IN. I THINK MR. BOETTCHER IS WITH US NOW. CORRECT. WE COULD ASK HIM TO COME UP TO THE MICROPHONE AND WE'LL START IT OFF WITH QUESTIONS FROM YOU, MR. JULIAN. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU WANT TO 30S. 
          TIM. DO YOU WANT TO HAVE A LEAD IN FIRST, OR DO YOU WANT TO? WHATEVER YOU WANT TO DO. BUT I'M NOT AS TALL AS DAN GILLMOR, SO HOPEFULLY HE CAN HEAR ME A LITTLE BIT BETTER. LOVELY. MISS MELOGRANO IS WITH YOU, WHO'S VERY HELPFUL TO EVERYONE. SO THIS IS AN MELOGRANO, OUR CUSTOMER SERVICE MANAGER, WHO'S BEEN VERY CLOSELY RELATED TO THE QUESTION RAISED BY MR. JULIAN, WHICH, IF I UNDERSTAND CORRECTLY, HAS TO DO WITH OUR THIRD PARTY PAYMENT SYSTEM AND RECURRING PAYMENTS, AUTOMATIC WITHDRAWALS. IS THAT QUESTIONS ON THAT? YES. A LOT OF QUESTIONS. PROBABLY TWO YEARS NOW. PROBABLY. YEAH. THE REAL ISSUE IS THAT JUST ABOUT TWO YEARS AGO, THE BANK WE WERE USING AT THE TIME, CHASE HAD A THIRD PARTY PAYMENT SYSTEM, PAY CONNECTIONS. THEY TOLD US THEY WERE PULLING THE PLUG ON IT. WE HAD TO MIGRATE TO A NEW ONE. WE WENT THROUGH MONTHS AND MONTHS AND MONTHS OF TESTING. IT WOULDN'T WORK. IT WOULDN'T ACCEPT OUR FILES THE WAY WE WERE SENDING THEM. THEY WANTED TO REVAMP THE WHOLE FILE SYSTEM. SO WE SHOPPED FOR ANOTHER ONE. THAT DIDN'T WORK. WE FINALLY HAVE ONE. NOW THAT I THINK WE'RE ABOUT 60 DAYS AWAY FROM IMPLEMENTING. SO IT'S BEEN A LONG, GRUELING PROCESS, BUT WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE GET IT RIGHT. WE WANT TO MAKE SURE ALL THE MONEY GOES TO THE RIGHT ACCOUNTS. PEOPLE CAN SIGN UP. THEY CAN ACTIVATE THEIR OWN ACCOUNT, ETC. THE SYSTEM WE USE NOW IS WITH COMMUNITY BANK. CHASE BANK, IT'S BACK TO CHASE. OH, OKAY. WE'VE GONE THROUGH SEVERAL BANKS WITH CITIZENS. CITIZENS BANK. THANK YOU. YEAH. SO THEY FINALLY STEPPED FORWARD WITH A SYSTEM THAT WORKS FOR US. AND AGAIN, YOU KNOW, IT'S BEEN MONTHS OF TESTING A LOT OF FAILURES, RECONFIGURING OF FILES. BUT WE FINALLY HAVE A SYSTEM THROUGH CITIZENS BANK. 
          THANK YOU VERY MUCH. YEAH, THAT WILL WORK. AND IN FACT, JUST LAST WEEK AND IN OUR IT STAFF AND OUR COMPTROLLER'S OFFICE HAD A MEETING WITH THIS COMPANY AND EVERYTHING IS PROGRESSING VERY WELL. SO I 60 DAYS OR SO IS THE ESTIMATE AT THIS POINT MAYBE LESS THAN THAT. WE'LL BE READY TO ROLL IT. WHEN WE DO. WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A BIG PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT. SO EVERYBODY KNOWS THE SYSTEM IS NOW ACTIVE AGAIN, AND EVERYTHING CAN GO BACK TO THE WAY IT WAS. FOR THOSE THAT WANT TO DO AUTOMATIC PAYMENTS AND AUTOMATIC WITHDRAWALS. OKAY, NOW TO THE SAME VEIN OF THAT, IF YOU IF YOU I DON'T KNOW IF YOU'VE EVER GONE TO NATIONAL GRID'S RARELY THEY HAVE A GREAT INTERFACE THOUGH. SO IF YOU HAVE MULTIPLE PROPERTIES YOU HAVE MULTIPLE ACCOUNTS, RIGHT. WITH ONE ACCOUNT. AND YOU CAN PAY ALL YOUR STUFF RIGHT, RIGHT DOWN, CHECK YOUR ACCOUNT, CHECK YOUR BILLING, ALL THE THINGS LIKE THAT. WELL, IF YOU LIKE THAT, OR WILL IT BE LIKE IT WAS PREVIOUS THAT WE HAVE TO HAVE A SEPARATE PASSWORD AND USERNAME FOR EACH AND EVERY ACCOUNT THAT YOU HAVE. 
          INITIALLY IT'S GOING TO BE SEPARATE ACCOUNTS. WE'RE TOLD THAT WE CAN MIGRATE TO A SYSTEM WHERE WE CAN CONSOLIDATE ALL THOSE. BUT RIGHT NOW THE MAIN GOAL IS TO JUST GET THE THING LIVE AND ACTIVE, AND THEN WE'RE GOING TO FINESSE IT AS WE GO ALONG AND BE ABLE TO MOVE TO THE SYSTEM THAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT, WHICH I'M NOT SURE HOW LONG THAT WILL TAKE TO GIVE YOU ANY INDICATION. SO THE REASON THAT IT IS THE WAY IT IS, AS YOU KNOW, CHARGES FOR WATER AND SEWER STAY WITH PROPERTIES. SO EACH PROPERTY HAS A SINGLE SIGN ON AND EACH ACCOUNT HAS A SINGLE SIGN ON IN ORDER FOR US TO MIGRATE WHERE WE COULD DO SOMETHING LIKE NATIONAL GRID, WE WOULD HAVE TO BE ABLE TO LINK THOSE ACCOUNTS AND UNLINK THOSE ACCOUNTS AS TENANTS MOVE IN AND OUT OF PROPERTIES. SO IT'S A LOT MORE COMPLICATED THAN IT THAN IT IS FOR NATIONAL GRID, BECAUSE NATIONAL GRID, YOU HAVE AN ACCOUNT BASED ON YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER AND IT STAYS WITH YOU. COLLECTIONS GO BY YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER. WE DO NOT COLLECT THAT KIND OF INFORMATION. SO OURS ALWAYS STAYS WITH THE PROPERTY BECAUSE THERE ARE TAX PULL OFFS FOR BOTH WATER AND SEWER. SO IT'S A DIFFERENT ANIMAL UNFORTUNATELY. AS A QUICK EXAMPLE, IF A LANDLORD OWNS TEN PROPERTIES AND THOSE ARE ALL BUNDLED AND LINKED TOGETHER UNDER THAT ONE NAME, IF THE LANDLORD DECIDES TO SELL ONE, WE HAVE TO DECOUPLE IT. IT'S GOT TO THEN BE ATTACHED TO SOMEBODY ELSE'S. AND AS AN SAID, BECAUSE THE BILL IS ATTACHED TO THE PROPERTY, THAT'S THE IDENTIFIER. SO WE HAVE TO FIGURE OUT A WAY TO RECODE ALL THOSE THINGS AND HAVE SOME CONNECTING LINKS IN THOSE FILES TO PULL TOGETHER AND THEN UNCOUPLE IT WHEN WE NEED TO. SO IT'S GOING TO TAKE A LITTLE BIT LONGER TO DEVELOP THAT WE THINK WE CAN. BUT JUST TO GET THE THING OUT AND MOVING FOR THE GENERAL PUBLIC, IT'S GOING TO WORK PRETTY MUCH THE SAME AS THE OLD ONE DID. UNTIL WE CAN ADD THESE NEW FEATURES, UNFORTUNATELY IT WON'T WORK. I MEAN, IT WAS LIKE, YEAH, IT WORKED UNTIL THEY TOLD US IT DIDN'T. SO THEY PULLED THE PLUG ON IT AND WE WERE LEFT HIGH AND DRY. SO THAT'S WHAT'S TAKEN A WHILE TO PULL THE PLUG. RIGHT? I'M GOOD. MIKE. YEAH. OKAY. ALL 
          [00:05:13]
RIGHT. THANKS. THANK YOU BOTH FOR COMING. THANKS FOR COMING IN, Y'ALL. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. 
          COULDN'T CALL HIM AND ASK HIM THAT. YOU NEED TO DRAG HIM HERE. ALL RIGHT, CALM DOWN. MR. OH! WHOA, WHOA. SPOKEN LIKE ME IN PERSON. HEY. DOING CHAT. DOCKETS. LET'S JUMP RIGHT INTO 
          [a. 2025-1552 – PLANNING RE:     APPROVAL OF A FLOOD MITIGATION GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN ONEIDA COUNTY, THROUGH ITS DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING, AND THE VILLAGE OF CLINTON  ]
THEM. WE'RE GOING TO GO TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. ARE YOU? THIS IS DOCKET 1552 FLOOD MITIGATION GRANT PLANNING REQUEST FOR AN AWARD THROUGH THE UNITED COUNTY FLOOD MITIGATION GRANT PROGRAM FOR CLINTON, THE REQUEST FROM THE VILLAGE WAS 205,040 OUT OF AN OVERALL PROJECT COST OF TWO 7540 TO ADDRESS THE DAMAGE THAT OCCURRED WHEN THE CULVERT THAT CONVEYED THE SAINT MARY'S BROOK ALONG THE SHENANGO AVE SOUTH FAILED BACK IN MARCH OF 2025, PLACING AN APARTMENT COMPLEX AT RISK OF STRUCTURAL FAILURE. THIS WORK WILL CONCENTRATE ON EMERGENCY REPAIRS TO CULVERT WHILE CLINTON SEEKS FUNDING FROM OUR STATE RESILIENCE WATERSHED GRANT PROGRAM TO DEVELOP A PERMANENT SOLUTION. WITH THAT SAID, ANY QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE? MR. DAVIS? YEAH, I'D JUST LIKE TO ASK MATT. THAT WAS. THAT APARTMENT COMPLEX THAT WAS IMPACTED. WHICH ONE WAS THAT IN PARTICULAR? YOU'RE ASKING ME SOMETHING RIDICULOUS LIKE THAT? THE NO, BECAUSE I DON'T KNOW IT OFF TOP OF MY HEAD. THE LET ME SEE, IT'S FORGET WHAT IT'S CALLED. IT'S ON SOUTH AVE AVE SOUTH. YEAH, THAT'S WHERE IT IS. I DON'T KNOW, I DON'T KNOW THE NAME OF THIS CLINTON SCHOOL, BUT THAT'S NOT THE FIRST TIME IT'S FAILED. IT'S NOT. NO, THE MITIGATION PROJECT IS ALREADY FAILED IN THAT STORM. THAT'S IN THE LETTER TO YOU GUYS IN THE CONTRACT. SO THIS IS TO REPLACE THAT WHILE THEY LOOK FOR THE FUNDING FOR THE LONG TERM SOLUTION. OUR TOWN HIGHWAY SUPERINTENDENT JOHN SCOTT'S BEEN TRYING TO GET THAT TO PUT IN THE MITIGATION OKAY. GREAT. THANK YOU. THAT'S DONE. WE'LL CALL THE VOTE. ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. 
          OPPOSED PASSES UNANIMOUSLY JAMES, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. MOVING ON TO 1367, PUBLIC WORKS 
          [b. 2025-1367 – PUBLIC WORKS RE:     APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NO. 001 TO AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN ONEIDA COUNTY, THROUGH ITS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, AND MARCH ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTS AND PLANNERS, P.C.  ]
IS ASKING FOR CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT ONE TO THE CONTRACT WITH MARSH ASSOCIATES TO PROVIDE ARCHITECTURAL AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION SERVICES FOR THE NEW SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BUILDING ON THE MVCC UTICA CAMPUS. THE AMENDMENT INCREASES MARCH'S REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES RATHER TO 150,000. IT'S AN INCREASE OF 115. ALL THE OTHER FEES REMAIN THE SAME. THE ADDITIONAL COST IS BASICALLY REFLECTED BECAUSE THIS PROJECT WAS ORIGINALLY GOING TO BE A RENOVATION PROJECT TO THE EXISTING BUILDING, WHICH HAS NOW BEEN CHANGED TO NEW CONSTRUCTION. SO THERE'S A WHOLE BAG OF CONSTRAINTS THAT COME INTO PLAY WITH THAT. SO THAT'S THE RATIONALE BEHIND THE INCREASE. QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE. MR. JULIAN, THANK YOU. JUST IN THE FIRST PARAGRAPH IT STATES POTENTIAL ADDED EXPENSES AS THE PROJECT MATURES TO PROVIDE SOME FLEXIBILITY SO THAT THE CHANCES, PERHAPS THAT THIS MAY NOT HIT THE 115 NUMBER. 
          YES. THIS IS REIMBURSABLE ONLY SO IT'S NOT TO EXCEED. SO IT'S YOU KNOW, SO THERE'S GEOTECHNICAL STUDIES THAT NEED TO BE DONE. AS WE START TO DO THE FOUNDATION AND OTHER THINGS, WE'RE ABLE TO DO THEM AND NOT HOLD UP AND PAY MORE IN CONSTRUCTION COSTS AND EVERYTHING ELSE. SO WE'RE ABLE TO DO IT THROUGH OUR DESIGNERS AND KEEP THINGS MOVING AND SEE HOW GOOD YOU REALLY ARE THEN. SURE. YEP. TOUGH. THANK YOU. OTHER QUESTIONS, MR. MAYOR, WHEN YOU SAY REIMBURSABLE THROUGH WHO OR HOW. SO IT'S YOU KNOW SO A COMMON THING WE DO WITH REIMBURSABLE IS LIKE FOR ASBESTOS ABATEMENT WHEN WE'RE DOING ASBESTOS MONITORING, WE'RE NOT SURE HOW LONG THE MONITORING WILL TAKE PLACE. SO THE ARCHITECT PAYS FOR IT UP FRONT. 
          AND THEN IT COMES TO US AND IT'S A STRAIGHT COST. SO IT'S NOT LIKE A CHANGE ORDER OR THERE'S NOT A OVERHEAD AND PROFIT BUILT INTO IT. IT'S JUST A STRAIGHT PASS THROUGH TO THE ARCHITECT. 
          THE ARCHITECT COORDINATES IT. IT'S THEIR RESPONSIBILITY TO MAKE SURE IT'S DONE RIGHT, AND THEN WE JUST PAY THE BILL THROUGH THEM FOR THAT WORK. AND SO A FOLLOW UP, MAYBE FOR RANDY, OF THE EXPENSES IN THIS PROJECT, WOULD THAT BUILDING TOTAL ONE WOULD BE COST SHARED BACK WITH NEW YORK STATE, CORRECT. YEAH. YES. COMPLETE. SO $5,050 FOR DOLLAR. SO WHEN WE'RE SEEING THIS ON OUR END OF AN INCREASE ULTIMATELY THAT WILL BE SUBMITTED BACK TO THE STATE AS A COLLEGE EXPENSE AND REIMBURSE PART OF THAT BACK. VERY GOOD. THANK YOU. THANK YOU MA'AM. 
          OTHER QUESTIONS HAVING NONE. WE'LL CALL THE VOTE ON 1367. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. OPPOSED. 
          [c. 2025-1500 – PUBLIC WORKS RE:     APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN ONEIDA COUNTY, THROUGH ITS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, AND MARCH ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTS AND PLANNERS, P.C.  ]
          [00:10:05]
PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. MOVING ON TO 1500. PUBLIC WORKS. ASKED FOR CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO TO AN AGREEMENT WITH MARSH ASSOCIATES FOR CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION SERVICES FOR THE 2024 RTA WING RENOVATION PROJECT, MARSH SEEKS TO HIRE SUBCONTRACTOR RAMBO TO PROVIDE STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING SERVICES. THE ADDITIONAL FEE IS $15,000, WHICH TAKES US UP FROM 83 5 TO 98 FIVE. QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE, MR. NEWTON. SO THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SERVICES, WOULDN'T THAT INCLUDE THE ENGINEERING PORTION? I MEAN, HOW WAS THAT CONTRACT? THIS IS THIS IS CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION COSTS. SO WHEN WE FIRST SO THIS WAS AN ARPA PROJECT. SO IT WAS WE WERE GETTING THIS DONE AND WE ACTUALLY HAD MARCH ADD IN THE RAMBLE DESIGN FROM THE FROM THE ASSESSMENT THAT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT DID OF THE WHOLE AREA WING. THERE WERE SOME STRUCTURAL ISSUES FOUND IN RAMBLE HAD ALREADY DONE A LOT OF THE LEGWORK SO AS NOT TO, YOU KNOW, PAY ANOTHER COMPANY TO DO WHAT THEY ALREADY DID. WE HAD THEM ADD THEM TO IT. AND THEN THAT WAS JUST FOR DESIGNING IT. SO WE GET IT DESIGNED, BID OUT AND CONTRACTED SO THAT WE WOULDN'T LOSE THE ARPA FUNDS. SO IT WAS BID OUT, DESIGN BID OUT, CONTRACTED BY THE END OF THE YEAR. AND THEN ONCE THAT WAS ALL DONE, WE APPROACHED MARCH FOR GETTING THEIR CONTRACT CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION SERVICES. SO AS THE CONSTRUCTION IS GOING ON, IF THINGS ARE FOUND, IF THERE'S THINGS THAT THEY NEED TO REVIEW AND CHANGE AND EVERYTHING ELSE, THAT'S THE SERVICES THAT ARE COVERED THERE. WHEN THEY DID THAT FOR US, THE 38 FIVE THAT WE CAME TO YOU, I THINK A MONTH OR TWO AGO, FOR THEY DID NOT INCLUDE THE RAMBLE SIDE. THEY ASSUMED THE RAMBLE WAS ALREADY INCLUDED IN THAT ORIGINAL ONE, BUT IT WAS NOT. SO THAT'S WHERE THE 15,000. THERE IS A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF STRUCTURAL WORK WE'LL BE DOING, AND THE RAMBLE SERVICES ARE NEEDED FOR THE, YOU KNOW, TO BE PART OF THE WEEKLY CONSTRUCTION MEETINGS OR THE BI WEEKLY MEETINGS AND WHATNOT, AND HAVE THEM ON SITE TO COME ON AND INSPECT WHEN THEY REINFORCE THE PILLARS OR WHEN THEY REDO THE SIDING OR THE OVERHANG THAT THEY'RE INSPECTING THOSE AND VERIFYING AND EVERYTHING ELSE THAT THEY'RE ALL SET. I WOULD JUST I JUST THOUGHT THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN IN THE ORIGINAL PROPOSAL FOR THIS ONE WAS A LITTLE BECAUSE WE WERE I WAS BASICALLY UTILIZING WORK THAT'S ALREADY DONE AS PART OF ANOTHER PROJECT AND BROUGHT THEM IN AND KIND OF FORCED THEM ON MARCH AS THEIR SUB. AND THERE WASN'T AS MUCH THAT COMMUNICATION THAT WAS. I DIDN'T CLEARLY SET THAT UP WITH THEM. SO THAT'S ON ME FOR THAT PART OF IT. IT'S NOT A TON OF MONEY, BUT I WAS JUST OKAY, THANK YOU. APPRECIATE IT. 
          OTHER QUESTIONS HAVING NONE. WE'LL CALL THE VOTE ON 1500. ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. ANY 
          [d. 2025-1480 – PUBLIC WORKS RE:     APPROVAL OF THE AGREEMENT TEMPLATE FOR PAVEMENT MARKING TO BE USED FOR AGREEMENTS BETWEEN ONEIDA COUNTY AND VARIOUS TOWNS, VILLAGES AND CITIES]
OPPOSED? PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. MOVING ON TO 1480. THIS IS OUR ANNUAL TEMPLATE STRIPING AGREEMENT. PUBLIC WORKS SEEKS APPROVAL OF THE TEMPLATE AGREEMENT WITH MUNICIPALITIES TO PROVIDE ROAD PAVEMENT MARKING SERVICE SERVICES FOR TWO, TWO, 25. FOR THIS YEAR, THE MUNICIPALITIES PAY THE COUNTY A PER MILE RATE FOR THE CENTERLINE AND STRIPING. SO IT'S 100% REIMBURSABLE BACK TO THE COUNTY FOR THE WORK THAT WE DO. QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE. WE'LL CALL THE VOTE ON 1480. ON FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. OPPOSED PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU MATT TWO 
          [e. 2025-1510 – WATER POLLUTION RE:     APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN ONEIDA COUNTY, THROUGH ITS DEPARTMENT OF WATER QUALITY & WATER POLLUTION CONTROL, AND BARTON & LOGUIDICE, D.P.C.  ]
LEFT. CARL WILL PICK ON YOU. SEE IF MR. BUCK HAS ANYTHING TO JUMP ON YOU ABOUT HERE AT 1510 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT. QUALITY AND WATER POLLUTION CONTROL SEEKS TO HIRE BARTON AND THE JUDAS TO PROVIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH THE PLANNING AND DESIGN OF WET WEATHER RESILIENCY ENHANCEMENTS. THE MAXIMUM FEE IS $485,000. THIS AGREEMENT IS FOR THE TERM COMMENCING UPON EXECUTION AND WOULD TERMINATE DECEMBER 31ST OF 27. THIS IS ALREADY A BUDGETED CAPITAL PROJECT, SO IT'S NOT NEW MONEY. THE MONEY'S THERE. THIS IS JUST LETTING IT OUT TO PARTNER THE JUDAS. QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE. HAVING NONE. CALL THE VOTE ON 1510. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. LAST DOCKET 1554 TO CLOSE. WE'RE 
          [f. 2025-1554 – WATER POLLUTION RE:   APPROVAL OF WORK ORDER # 27, AMENDMENT #13, CAPACITY MANAGEMENT, OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE (CMOM) PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION – FY2025 WITH GHD CONSULTING SERVICES INC.]
HERE. THIS IS FOR A WORK ORDER AMENDMENT. WATER QUALITY AND WATER POLLUTION CONTROL. REQUEST APPROVAL OF WORK ORDER 27, AMENDMENT 13 WITH THE CONSULTING SERVICES FOR SUPPORTING THE SEWER DISTRICTS 2025 CAPACITY MANAGEMENT, OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM. THE ESTIMATED COST IS 59,000, WHICH IS ALSO INCLUDED IN THE DEPARTMENT'S 2025 OPERATING 
          [00:15:04]
BUDGET REQUEST. CALL THE VOTE ON 1554. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. OPPOSED PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. 
          I'LL TAKE A MOTION TO ADJOURN. SO MOVED.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.